Legal Opinion

Road Improvement Dist. No. 5 of Crittenden County, Ark. v. Roach

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1927No. 7542PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from a decree, in an action for an accounting, allowing recovery against appellant for balance found due under a construction, contract.

Appellees graded certain roads for appellant under a written contract. Up to January 1, 1920, 1. R. Packard was engineer for appellant. He was then replaced by the Morgan Engineering Company. This action was for a balance of $40,891.22, due on work doné up to January 1, 1920, and a balance of $14,312.44, for work done thereafter.

The dispute of fact was as to the amount of work done. The master found, by other evidence, that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Chicago, Santa Fé & California Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eddy v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Ehrle v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Menke v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. McCullough v. Clinch-Mitchell Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Standard Title Insurance Company v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API