Legal Opinion

McAdoo v. Sayre

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1904No. S.F. No. 3974PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition to the Judge of the Superior Court of Lake County. M. S. Sayre, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Maguire, Lindsay & Wyckoff, and Houx & Barrett, for Petitioners.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the defendant as judge of the superior court of Lake County from making an order declaring the trust terminated and directing certain testamentary trustees to pay over, convey, and deliver the trust property to the beneficiaries.

The facts are substantially as follows: Upon the final settlement of the estate of Cora Lyons Floyd a large amount of property was distributed to certain trustees in trust to hold the same during the lifetime of the daughter of deceased, to maintain and support the daughter during her life out of the income,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alison v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Keogh v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bank of California, National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. California Trust Co. v. HubbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Childs v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Parkman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Linsteadt v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API