Legal Opinion

Seligman & Co. v. Glastonbury Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1948No. 32201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. Exceptions to rulings on pleadings and ruling on motion for nonsuit are not proper subject-matter of a motion for a new trial.

2. It is never error for a court to refuse to direct a verdict.

3. Special ground 7, complaining that the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony which tended to vary the terms of the written contract sued upon, will not be considered because the ground in itself is incomplete. This ground does not show in what respect this testimony varied the terms of the contract, nor does it set out the terms of the contract. It has long been the established practice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins & JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Avery & Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API