Legal Opinion

Hankins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1933No. 7124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted on the eighth count of an indictment which charged him with selling a quantity of morphine, a derivative of opium, without receiving the written order required by 26 USCA § 696. He was also convicted on several other similar counts; but as the sentence was less than could have been imposed under the eighth count it is necessary to consider only the errors assigned which relate to it. Brown v. United States (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 589; Friscia v. United States (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 977. It is argued in behalf of appellant that the jury was prejudiced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Friscia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Randall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API