Legal Opinion
In re Kirschbraun
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 1, 1930No. 2504PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(xARREtt, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This matter is before us on appeal from the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting certain claims of appellant for process and apparatus patent relating to a claimed improvement for treating hydrocarbons.
'Two claims numbered 5 and 6, respectively, were allowed. Those appealed are Nos. 12 to 18, inclusive. Nos. 17 and 18 were not before the examiner but were presented to the board which after considering them, held them unpatentable over prior art and declined to recommend their admission and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lourie Implement Co. v. LenhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Anderson v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re VickersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Huntman Stabilizer Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Application of RayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952