In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 15, 1986. Appeal of United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1ConcurrenceMcMILLIAN, Circuit Judge
I agree the order of the district court should be affirmed but not for the reasons set forth in the panel opinion.1 I would not remand the case for reconsideration. Accordingly, I concur in the result only.
I agree that we have appellate jurisdiction to review the order of the district court under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule. At 678.
As I read the district court’s order, the district court held only that “in the face of the specific command” of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)(2), it lacked authority to issue the protective order. In re Grand Jury Subpoena No. GJ 31, 628 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ca 79-3426 in Re Swearingen Aviation Corporation, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Fairchild Industries, Inc. And Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- In Re Vescovo Special Grand JuryDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1979
- In Re Swearingen Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- In Re Proceedings Before the Grand Jury Summoned October 12, 1970District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.