Legal Opinion

People v. Pickett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, in failing to argue that County Court erred in ordering restitution inasmuch as it was not part of the plea bargain. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of March 14, 2008 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFroise, 151 AD2d 1046).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LeFroisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PickettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. PICKETT, CLIFFORD K., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API