Legal Opinion

Burroughs Bldg. Material Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 9, 1929No. Docket No. 18763Published

Amounts paid by a taxpayer engaged in the building-material business, on account of fines, court costs and attorneys' fees as the result of an indictment under a state statute which prohibited certain price-fixing agreements, are not deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on the taxpayer's business.

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS BUILDING MATERIAL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Burroughs Bldg. Material Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 18763.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

18 B.T.A. 101; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2133;

November 9, 1929, Promulgated

Amounts paid by a taxpayer engaged in the building-material business, on account of fines, court costs and attorneys' fees as the result of an indictment under a state statute which prohibited certain price-fixing agreements, are not deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on the taxpayer's business.

Donald Horne, Esq., for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Burroughs Bldg. Material Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  4. George Ringler & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  5. Harris v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API