Wiggins v. Triesler Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Although plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal, he failed to provide any assignments of error for review and present those arguments in his brief. Because this Court’s scope of review on appeal is *371limited to a consideration of those assignments of error set out in the record on appeal, plaintiff’s appeal is deemed abandoned. N.C.R. App. P. 10(a) (1994); see also N.C.R. App. P. 28 (1994).
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in ruling defendant violated the provisions of G.S. § 66-98 entitled “Prohibited acts.” G.S. § 66-98 provides, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- City of Statesville v. RothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cannizzaro v. Set in Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019