Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Triesler Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1994No. 9326DC867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Although plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal, he failed to provide any assignments of error for review and present those arguments in his brief. Because this Court’s scope of review on appeal is *371limited to a consideration of those assignments of error set out in the record on appeal, plaintiff’s appeal is deemed abandoned. N.C.R. App. P. 10(a) (1994); see also N.C.R. App. P. 28 (1994).

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in ruling defendant violated the provisions of G.S. § 66-98 entitled “Prohibited acts.” G.S. § 66-98 provides, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. City of Statesville v. RothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cannizzaro v. Set in Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API