Legal Opinion

Richards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1954No. 14644_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The single question presented for review is whether [under Section 22(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A., as interpreted in Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331, 60 S.Ct. 554, 84 L.Ed. 788] the Tax Court correctly held that the taxpayers are accountable for the dividends on certain shares of stock to which they retained the legal title although an interest in the shares had been donated in trust for their children.

The facts were all stipulated, subject to the right of either party to introduce further evidence. One additional item offered by the petitioner was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  3. Benton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Cushman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Scofield v. MauritzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodolfo Jubilado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API