Legal Opinion
Clark v. Policy-Holders Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1934No. Civ. No. 1278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order deny- • ing a motion for a change of venue to Los Angeles County in an action filed by the respondent in Tulare County to recover, as beneficiary, under two policies of life insurance issued by the appellant. The appellant’s principal place of business is in Los Angeles and the policies were applied for by the respondent’s husband and delivered to him in that county on May 16, 1931. At that time the insured was a resident of Los Angeles County, but, at his subsequent request, notices of premiums, assessments and dues were sent by the appellant to him at his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bank of Yolo v. Sperry Flour Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Kiku Saito v. Policy Holders L. Ins. Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Robinson v. Order of Railway EmployeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- McKenzie v. Los Angeles Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Lucas Enterprises, Inc. v. Paul C. Harman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Supply Co. v. GoldsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Ellis v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Moore Loans, Inc. v. B. E. Hardin Enterprises, Inc.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1985