Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Harte

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 2, 1997No. 96-P-683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Before his death on October 5, 1995, at the age of ninety-five, Martin Leo Coyne (the decedent) executed a will naming Mr. John B. Harte, the petitioner for probate of the document, as executor.

The will, signed on July 2, 1990, left the decedent’s entire estate “to the then trustee of an Indenture of Trust,” which was created at the same time. When the will (without the trust instrument) was offered for probate, the decedent’s nephew Arthur E. Gilmore, Jr., pursuant to Probate Court Rule 16 (1987), see Wimberly v. Jones, 26 Mass. App. Ct. 944, 945 n.4 (1988), appeared in opposition to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Neill v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Cutter v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Heinrich v. SilvernailMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Wimberly v. JonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brogan v. BroganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API