Legal Opinion
Boyce v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 1, 2001No. 98-1280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
On June 4, 2001, in a published opinion, this panel held that Boyce’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus sought relief which was not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and that the district court had not erred in dismissing that petition. This matter comes before the court on Boyce’s petition for rehearing filed June 20, 2001. Boyce states that the Bureau of Prisons transferred him from ADX Florence, Colorado to FCI Sheridan, Oregon on May 31, 2001. He points out that the transfer is precisely the relief which his petition requested, and he contends that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Great Western Sugar Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- James Robert Burrus v. Charles Turnbo, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Palma-Salazar v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Boyce v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- (HC) Baesa v. ArvizaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (HC) Fletcher, Jr. v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (HC) Pananyan v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.