Legal Opinion
State v. Carroll
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 7, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The information charges, in count one, that the defendant failed to conspicuously display at each entrance to the Rialto Theatre in New Haven, any placard on which was plainly printed the standing-room capacity of the place; and in count two, that defendant violated the order of the chief of the State police limiting the number of persons to fifty who might occupy standing-room in said theatre, contrary to Chapter 25 of the Public Acts of 1919.
No question arises as to the sufficiency of the allegations of the information in charging a crime under this statute. The accused was arrested upon a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Morris v. BulkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- State v. KeenaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- State v. PritchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- State v. CampaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Jones v. Mansfield Training SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.