Legal Opinion

Fulton National Bank v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1980No. 35806PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, Justice.

On September 22, 1976, Fulton National Bank repossessed a 1972 Ford Torino from Roland C. Marshall. Marshall subsequently filed suit against the bank, alleging wrongful repossession and seeking damages for conversion. By amendment he added a claim for conversion based on the allegation that the bank had failed to sell the car within 90 days of repossession as required by Code Ann. § 109A-9 — 505. The bank counterclaimed for the unpaid balance on the note, interest, cost of collection and attorney fees. The case was tried to a judge on stipulated facts and judgment was entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brand v. Montega Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Marshall v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Marshall v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Andrew v. CarithersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wendlandt v. Shepherd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Claxton Poultry Co. v. City of ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Sapp v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Tyner v. SheriffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. BROWN v. TUCKER; And Vice VersaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API