Martin v. Cleveland
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill for injunction. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Statement by the Court.
Read the full summary
Bill for injunction. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Statement by the Court. Appellant filed his hill in the Superior Court of Cook county, alleging that he is a physician and surgeon in practice in the City of Chicago, and for a number of years he has made a specialty of operative gynecology; that for many years he has been secretary of the medical faculty of the Post-Graduate School of Chicago, and as such has lectured on the subject of Gynecology before a large number of medical practitioners throughout the western states, who have…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith
The terms of the contract between the parties set out in the bill are admitted by the answer, with the exception of the provision that in the matter of workmanship the book to be printed was to compare favorably with the text book of Howard A. Kelly, M. D., on Operative Gynecology. Upon this provision of the contract the testimony of appellant is fully corroborated by the testimony of Margaret L. Bowen, who during the time of the preparation of the hook in question was secretary of appellant. We think, therefore, that the preponderance of the evidence on this disputed provision of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Field v. BarlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Graves v. Key City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fowler v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918