Legal Opinion

Elliott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1992No. CR 91-50PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keith Barnard Elliott was convicted of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance. His conviction was affirmed by this court.

Elliott's Rule 32 petition was denied by the circuit court of Franklin County.

Elliott alleges that the trial court erred by denying his petition on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Elliott further alleges that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

Issue I

Newly Discovered Evidence

The newly discovered evidence consists of Jennifer Bryant's testimony about an entry in her diary that showed that Elliott stayed with her until 10:00 p.m. on the day that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harich v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Hamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API