Wolfork v. Tackett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ellington, Judge.
Georgia applies the federal doctrine of judicial estoppel to preclude the prosecution of unliquidated tort claims that discharged debtors failed to list as assets in their federal bankruptcy petitions. Southmark Corp. v. Trotter, Smith &c., 212 Ga. App. 454, 455-456 (442 SE2d 265) (1994). The question in this appeal is whether a debtor’s failure to supplement a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition or to reopen the bankruptcy proceedings so as to list a cause of action accruing after the filing of the petition but before the discharge of the bankruptcy precludes the debtor from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southmark Corp. v. Trotter, Smith & JacobsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Johnson v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Fleet v. United States Consumer Council, Inc. (In Re Fleet)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Clark v. PerinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Byrd v. JRC Towne Lake, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Scoggins v. Arrow Trucking Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
- Smalls v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Wolfork v. TackettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- In Re TarrerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.