Legal Opinion
Fort Worth &. D. C. Ry. Co. v. Lovett
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 21, 1924No. 2332PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to Rave been suffered by the plaintiff, Mrs. Lov-ett, and is the second appeal .in the case. 243 S. W. 519.
The case is fully stated in the former opinion and need not be restated except in such matters as are incidental to the questions disposed of herein. Appellant’s proposition No. 1 presents the alleged error that the court erred in refusing to peremptorily instruct a verdict for the defendant, for the reason that the undisputed facts in the case show that the brakeman was not acting within the scope of his authority in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Gulf, C. Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brown WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Payne v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carney v. Roberts Inv. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Glazer v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. TravisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.