Legal Opinion
Carlino v. Whitpain Investors
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 11, 1980No. Appeal, No. 41 T.D. 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Peter Carlino and his wife (petitioners) instituted this action for a preliminary injunction to require (1) that the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) revoke a highway occupancy permit it had issued to Whitpain Investors (developer); (2) that developer, on its forty-seven acre tract, restore a special setback and eliminate a particular access road; and that (3) Whitpain Township (township) refrain from conditioning developer’s permit to construct a multi-family complex on the tract upon provision of such an access road.1
PennDOT has filed preliminary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Palisades Properties, Inc. v. BrunettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- VF Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF SUMMITSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Houston Petroleum Co. v. Automotive Products Credit Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carlino v. Whitpain InvestorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Helicon Corp. v. Borough of BrownsvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ice v. Cross Roads BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Phoenix Resources, Inc. v. Duncan TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Carlino v. Whitpain InvestorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982