Legal Opinion

Paul Norris v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 16, 2014No. 2013-CA-00661-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J., for the Court:

¶ 1. Mississippi’s post-conviction-relief (PCR) statute is clear — it requires a petitioner who lodges a post-conviction challenge to give “[a] concise statement of the claims or grounds upon which the motion is based.” 1 Petitioners do not have an unfettered right to present claims not alleged in their PCR motions. 2 But here, that is precisely what Norris is trying to do.

¶ 2. Norris, who had been convicted of four separate felonies — robbery, attempted robbery, and two counts of felony eluding — filed a PCR motion challenging the computation and proportionality of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
  3. Burrough v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  4. United States v. Francisco J. Parra-IbanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Demarcus Ventrell Timmons v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  2. Reginald Desmond Wallace v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  3. Christopher Lee Conyers v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  4. Thomas Roby v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API