Paul Norris v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J., for the Court:
¶ 1. Mississippi’s post-conviction-relief (PCR) statute is clear — it requires a petitioner who lodges a post-conviction challenge to give “[a] concise statement of the claims or grounds upon which the motion is based.” 1 Petitioners do not have an unfettered right to present claims not alleged in their PCR motions. 2 But here, that is precisely what Norris is trying to do.
¶ 2. Norris, who had been convicted of four separate felonies — robbery, attempted robbery, and two counts of felony eluding — filed a PCR motion challenging the computation and proportionality of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
- Burrough v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Francisco J. Parra-IbanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Demarcus Ventrell Timmons v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- Reginald Desmond Wallace v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Christopher Lee Conyers v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Thomas Roby v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019