Perez v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentWachtler, J.
Money deposited in an American bank which is payable at any of its branches, should not be deemed to have its situs in every country in which the bank may have a branch office, so that the debt may be *474extinguished by any government which decides to confiscate the account “located” within its borders. The concept that a debt may have multiple situses — in every jurisdiction where the debtor has established an office — has never been held by the Supreme Court to be an essential or acceptable ingredient of the Act of State doctrine.
A more conservative application of the Act of State doctrine…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.