Van Gorder v. Masterplanned, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied.
Inasmuch as a triable issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiffs, who claim to have acquired title to defendant’s property by adverse possession, acknowledged during the stat*1108utory 10-year period that actual ownership of the property rested with defendant, summary judgment should not have been awarded to plaintiffs. Such a concession, if found by the trier of fact to exist, would negate an essential element of plaintiffs’ adverse possession…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Van Valkenburgh v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by27 opinions
- MAG Associates, Inc. v. SDR Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Oistacher v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Walling v. PrzybyloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Merget v. Westbury Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Shults v. GearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.