Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonecutter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. 2006-0433Published

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F).

{¶ 2} On February 28, 2006, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of South Carolina entered March 11, 2005, in In the Matter of Dane Arlen Bonecutter, 363 S.C. 110, 610 S.E.2d 503, in which that court placed respondent on interim suspension. On March 21, 2006, this court ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state. Respondent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re BonecutterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API