Legal Opinion

Holston v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1982No. 21736PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

This is an action by respondent Jesse Mae Holston to recover damages from appellant Bertha Jackson for interference with respondent’s marital relationship and the alienation of her husband’s affection. The jury awarded a verdict for Six Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($6550.00) actual damages. Appellant appeals, alleging error on the part of the trial judge in (1) failing to sustain appellant’s counsel’s timely objection to a portion of respondent’s counsel’s jury argument, (2) to give a curative instruction thereto, or (3) to grant appellant’s motion for a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DurdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Jones v. DevereuxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. Jackson v. DuckworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnoldt v. Ashland Oil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mains v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Haskins v. Fairfield Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Haskins v. Fairfield Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. City of Columbia v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API