Legal Opinion

State v. Boggs

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2008No. CR-05-0174-APPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 On May 12, 2005, a jury determined that Steve Boggs should receive the death penalty for the May 2002 murders of Beatriz Alvarado, Kenneth Brown, and Fausto Jimenez. In accordance with Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.2(b), appeal to this Court is automatic. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5.3 of the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-4031 (2001).

I

A

¶ 2 On May 19, 2002, Alvarado, Brown, and Jimenez were working at a fast-food restaurant in Mesa, Arizona. 1 After ten p.m., only the…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. PrinceArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API