Legal Opinion

United States v. Invicta Seeland, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 24, 1938No. 4102Published

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

Appellee in this case imported at the port of New York certain watch movements, which were assessed with duty by the collector at *302.$2.50 each under paragraph 367 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Appellee protested this assessment, claiming the movements to be dutiable at $2.25 each under the same paragraph. The Customs Court sustained this claim and entered judgment accordingly. From such judgment the Government took this appeal.

Paragraph 367 of said tariff act, insofar as it is here pertinent, reads as follows:

Par. 367. (a) Watch movements, and time-lceeping, time-measuring, or time-indicating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernier v. BernierSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Andrews Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API