Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Village of Hyde Park

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard • Prendergast, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The question here is, whether the owner of property specially assessed for the purpose of grading and paving a street of an incorporated village, can interpose the objection, on an application to the court to confirm the assessment, that the village has not acquired title to the soil' to be graded and paved as a street.

The question is, in effect, answered in the negative by Village of Hyde Park v. Borden, 94 Ill. 26. The objection was there urged, as here, that the ordinance was void because it required the improvement to be made upon private property, and it was answered: “The statute does…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Village of Hyde Park v. BordenIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Mason v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Chicago v. BordenIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Allen v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Palmer v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API