Legal Opinion

Mandeville v. Marvin

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1883Published

Appeal from a judgment, entered upon the report of a referee, •whereby the plaintiff recovered the sum of $730.71, with costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Barker, J.:

The questions sought to be reviewed on this appeal are presented on the report of the referee and a bill of exceptions. The evidence produced on the trial is not set .forth in full. We cannot, therefore, review the questions of fact as found by the referee. It is stated in the bill of exceptions that certain facts were proved and tliat the evidence tended to establish other facts material to the issue; and the referee’s report contains a series of facts, as found by him, upon which he held as a conclusion of law that the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment in the sum of $730.71.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delaware Bank v. . JarvisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Jarvis v. . DriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Bell v. . DaggNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Folger v. . FitzhughNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Gracie v. . FreelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1848

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API