Legal Opinion
Staub v. Hanover Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 1, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 66 (1991)
596 A.2d 1096
THOMAS STAUB, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION/ENTITY, DEFENDANT, AND NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION/ENTITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 11, 1991.
Decided October 1, 1991.
Before Judges BRODY, MUIR, Jr. and LANDAU.
Leonard Ginsberg argued the cause for appellant (Robert Diorio, attorney; Leonard Ginsberg, on the brief).
Edward P. Papalia, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Joseph J. Michalowski, attorney; Joseph J.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tyler v. NJ Auto. Full Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Filippatos v. Selective Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. SzeliNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Calabrese v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Leetz v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- D'ANTONIO v. State FarmNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999