Legal Opinion

In Re Bolter

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 29, 1946No. 109666PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

Hannah Bolter has filed her petition to be naturalized as a citizen of the United States pursuant to § 310(a) of the Nationality Act of 1940. The petition is predicated upon petitioner’s claim that she is an “alien who, after September 21, 1922, and prior to May 24, 1934, has married a citizen of the United States * * *.” Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 710(a).

The facts are undisputed. Petitioner was married at Los Angeles March 2, 1930, to Jack Bolter, formerly Yechiel Baltinertis, who was born in Jerusalem, Palestine, on December 4, 1903, the son of Chajim Baltinertis, then a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Perkins v. ElgSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. United States v. ManziSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Battaglino v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Cepo v. BrownellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
  3. Meiji Fujizawa v. AchesonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  4. Sanders v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Rosasco v. BrownellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API