Legal Opinion

Panhandle National Bank v. Still

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1892No. 7256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

No statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

— This suit was brought by the appellant upon two promissory notes, aggregating $1129.28, both dated the 1st day of August, 1889, and due ninety days after date. Plaintiff’s original petition was filed on the 9th day of October, 1889, which it will be observed was before the maturity of the notes. The date of the notes and the time of their maturity were correctly described in the petition, and also in an affidavit for a writ of attachment made when the suit was brought. The notes did not bear interest before maturity, but stipulated for “10 per cent attorney fees if…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olivares v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Smith v. PickhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Central Texas Ice Co. v. ThomasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Robuck v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Cook v. Waco Auto Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API