Legal Opinion

Schoening v. Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1929No. 8134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

In his effort to recover damages, plaintiff in error was east at the conclusion of his evidence, and brings error. Hereinafter reference will be made to him as plaintiff, and to defendant in , error as defendant.

Defendant’s line of railway intersects plaintiff’s land, situated in Fremont county, Wyoming. It traverses said land in almost a straight line from southeast to northwest. Plaintiff alleges that the construction of the roadbed was contrary to sound engineering judgment, and that as a result thereof his land has been eroded, and where not eroded it has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Smelting Co. v. SisamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Suter v. Wenatchee Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. MullensSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Wilce v. City of CheneyWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fallon v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Fallon v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API