Legal Opinion

Baur v. Wepprecht

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction pendente lite, in an action for a permanent injunction and for damages. Defendants by a cross motion seek the dismissal of the complaint.

The complaint alleges in substance, inter alia, that:(a) defendants have agreed and combined to injure and destroy plaintiffs’ good will, trade, business and property;

*848(b) have and are falsely stating that plaintiffs are unfair to labor and that their employees are on strike, in furtherance of said conspiracy;(c) defendants have and are attempting to induce, persuade and intimidate persons, firms and corporations, to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Kane v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Thomas v. Musical Mutual Protective UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API