Legal Opinion

Farnham v. Pierce

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1886PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

The father of an infant four years of age, who has been committed to the custody of the overseers of the poor of the city of Taunton by the First District Court of Bristol, on findings that she was, by the neglect of her parent, growing up without education or salutary control, and in circumstances exposing her to lead an idle and dissolute life, and that she had a settlement in Taunton, seeks her discharge from custody, on a writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that the St. of 1882, c. 181, § 3, under which the court acted, is contrary to article 12 of the Declaration of Rights of this State.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re FerrierIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. County of McLean v. HumphreysIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Milwaukee Industrial School v. Supervisors of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Exparte CrouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  5. People ex rel. O'Connell v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dewitt v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Pee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API