Legal Opinion

People v. Carlson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to change venue of trial of indictment from Chautauqua County denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Chautauqua County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature. (See, People v DiPiazza, 14 NY2d 342; People v Simmons, 132 AD2d 1009; People v Oakes, 130 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. OakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. KroemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. LaffertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API