Woods v. Chrissinger
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
On former appeal (Woods v. Chrissinger et al., 230 Ala. 678, 163 So. 318) this court sustained the equity of the bill. The pertinent provisions of the will, viz., “Clause 8,” “Clause 7,” and paragraph or item “3” of the third codicil, are there set out. In codicil No. 1, the annuity payable to each of the sisters is specifically designated at $450.
That this provision for the sisters during the remainder of their natural lives was a primary purpose of the will, that a trust fund of $16,500 in money was to be set up, loaned out by Woods, as trustee, on first mortgages on real…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perkins v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Perkins v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Creamer v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Proctor v. ScharpffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Fleming v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.