Legal Opinion

STAMATIADES

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1966No. 1594PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim DeCision #1594 • 3Lenzu or STazetiemenrs • In Visa Petition Proceedings A-10904242 - Decided Disfrtiet Director June 8,1986 Since a biologist is a member of the professions within the meaning of section 203(a) (3), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.7s 83-236, a visa petition to accord third preference status to beneficiary, a qualified biologist, may be approved notwithstanding his current employment in the 'United States in a *nonprofessional occupation. '3 • The petitioner, a Clinical Professor of Anaesthesia at Harvard University and f)irector of Anaesthesia at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Factora v. District Director of the U. S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
  2. KHANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
  3. ORTEGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970
  4. SHAHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  5. RETINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API