Legal Opinion

Paschal v. Inman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1913No. 2498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Wood County. Paschal sued Inman for injunction, and obtained writ of error on the affirmance, on his appeal, of a judgment dissolving it.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

Alleging himself to be the duly elected and qualified public weigher of justice precinct Ho. 4 of Wood County, Sam Paschal instituted this suit to restrain Hugh Inman from conducting the business of a private weigher in such precinct and for the recovery of damages. Inman was not a factor or commission merchant or engaged in like business, and is not charged with having been employed to do any weighing for those engaged in such business. A temporary restraining order was issued by the district judge and afterwards dissolved upon hearing at chambers. The Honorable Court of Civil Appeals for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hedgepeth v. Hamilton Warehouse Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Whitfield v. Terrell Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Richards v. HolfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Davis v. McInnisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Gallagher v. RahmTexas Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Flippin v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. McCraw v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API