Carlsen v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Smithfield
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROTH, Judge:
11 Petitioner D. Craig Carlsen challenges a decision by the Board of Adjustment (the Board) for Smithfield City (the City), recognizing an existing, nonconforming animal rights use on property (the Property) owned by Carlsen's neighbors, Dale and Margaret Smith, We decline to disturb the Board's decision.
12 In 2009, the Smiths petitioned the Board to recognize an existing nonconforming animal rights use on the Property. See Smithfield City Code § 17.16.010 (providing that "nonconforming uses" are "uses of land or structures, which although legal at the time of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- First National Bank of Boston v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- ABCO Enterprises v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Marriage of GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fuller v. Springville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Hugoe v. Woods Cross CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Baker v. Park City Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Farley v. Utah CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Palmer v. St. George City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.