Legal Opinion

Roberto Tejeda v. Social Security Administration, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 8, 2026No. 1:26-cv-07096Unknown

1Opinion

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x ROBERTO TEJEDA, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PRO BONO COUNSEL -against- 26-CV-07096 (ER) (JW) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------x JENNIFER E. WILLIS, United States Magistrate Judge: On August 18, 2026, Plaintiff filed an application to request pro bono counsel. Dkt. No. 4. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s application is DENIED without prejudice. LEGAL STANDARD The in forma pauperis statute provides that the courts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Allen Hodge v. Police Officers: Colon, 623 and Repuerto, 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Bennie Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Terminate Control Corp. v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Casiano v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API