State v. Belden
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPike, J.
It is not necessary to consider whether the respondent was lawfully bound over. It is sufficient that there was no trial in the police court upon the merits. Marston v. Jenness, 11 N. H. 156, 158; State v. Runnals, 49 N. H. 498, 502; State v. Hodgkins, 42 N. H. 476. Upon this question the character of the order is conclusive. Commonwealth v. Harris, 8 Gray 470, 479. The hearing was only an examination to determine if there were probable grounds to hold the respondent to answer further. The police court must have ruled that the complaint sufficiently charged an aggravated assault, and, having…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Gaffney v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- United States v. LumsdenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1856