Thompson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
The issue presented in this unemployment compensation case is whether Harry B. Thompson’s notification to his employer on November 18, 1975 that he was not going to work because he had to get a replacement car was sufficient notice for his absence the following day. We find, when viewed in the light of all the facts pertinent to this case, that it was not and affirm the denial of benefits by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Beview (Board), pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensa*593tion Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crib Diaper Service, General Laundries, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Ferko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. BlouseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Collins v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. RodriguezCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tongel v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Powell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Thompson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Balaschak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978