Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Horn

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 1, 1895Published

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Arrowitz Wolfe and another against Edward O. Horn and others to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBisghoff, J.

The action was brought to foreclose a lien claimed, pursuant to the provisions of the mechanic’s lien law (chapter 342, Laws 1885, and chapter 316, Laws 1888), against the defendants Horn and Smith, as.owners and contractors, and the defendant Dow, as an owner only, for a balance owing of the fair and reasonable value of services rendered and materials furnished in the making of certain improvements upon the premises described in the complaint. Agreeably to the notice contained in the record, the appeal from the judgment entered was taken by "the defendants,” without naming them. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Flaherty v. . MinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Keller v. FeldmannNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Biershenk v. StokesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Brown v. SullivanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API