Legal Opinion

People v. Broughton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Osceola. Information for adultery. Kespondent was convicted»

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The respondent was convicted of adultery with one Adele A. Teeple, wife of Isaac J. Teeple-. Proof of the marriage was made out by the husband’s oath and by a recorded marriage certificate. As the two together identified the parties and there was an admission in open court of the fact by defendant, we see no special import*340anee in the objection. raised to the certificate, which was admissible, although possibly not sufficient by itself in a criminal case without some identification of parties.

Neither do' we think it was improper to prove a divorce by the introduction of the entire chancery…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. IshamMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hanley v. StateLucas Circuit Court · 1896
  5. Whalen v. StateOhio Circuit Courts · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API