Legal Opinion

Marchant v. Lorain Division of Koehring

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1979No. 20846PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is a products liability case. Appellant Marchant brought suit against the crane manufacturer (Lorain) for injuries he received when a crane “double blocked,” and the *245bucket in which he was riding crashed to the ground. The trial court granted the manufacturer’s motion for summary judgment as to all three theories of liability — negligence, strict tort and warranty. We reverse.

In granting Lorain’s motion, the trial court relied on Marchant v. Mitchell Distributing Co., 270 S. C. 29, 240 S. E. (2d) 511 (1977), a companion suit against the distributor of the crane. While we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Coger v. MacKinaw Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Higgins v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. Chesterfield Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Garcia v. Sky Climber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Walter R. Brooks, Jr. v. Medtronic, Inc., a Corporation, Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. Ray v. South Carolina National Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Coffey v. Chemical Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Salvo v. Hewitt, Coleman & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API