Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hubbard & Moffitt Commission Co. v. Cochrane

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 1, 1915PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — lío». W. B. Homer, Judge. (1) So much of the Grain Inspection Law of 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 285) as authorizes the Board of Warehouse Commissioners to establish State inspection and weighing of grain where they see fit, as defines and establishes public warehouses, and as authorizes the inspection of grain not stored in warehouses, is unconstitutional, as being a delegation of legislative power, and therefore is void.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — lío». W. B. Homer, Judge. (1) So much of the Grain Inspection Law of 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 285) as authorizes the Board of Warehouse Commissioners to establish State inspection and weighing of grain where they see fit, as defines and establishes public warehouses, and as authorizes the inspection of grain not stored in warehouses, is unconstitutional, as being a delegation of legislative power, and therefore is void. Art. 4, sec. 1, Missouri Constitution; Merchants Ex. v. Knott, 212 Mo. 616. Other provisions of said' Grain Inspection Law — including…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

I

BOND, J.

Warehousemen; Police Regulation.

(After stating the facts as above.) — A warehouseman is a person or corporation lawfully engaged in the business of storing goods for hire. The business is public or private, as it may foe conducted for the storage of the goods of the general public, or for those of certain *590persons. It was a vocation well known, recognized and defined at common law, which also established the rights and duties arising from this form of bailment. It includes the storage of all kinds of personal property-grain, cotton, fruit and other farm products— horses,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Merchants Exchange v. KnottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Barnes ex rel. Hayes v. WebsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  4. Henoch v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. La Crosse Lumber Co. v. SchwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McClare v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Ladies of the Modern Maccabees v. Illinois Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. Danville Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. German-American Mercantile Bank v. Illinois Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Union State Bank v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API