Davis v. Williams Communications, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HUNT, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant CSX’s Motion to Dismiss [3], Motion to Stay Discovery [13], and Motion for Protective Order [24],
I. Background
Because this case is before the Court on a motion to dismiss, the allegations contained in the Complaint must be accepted as true and the facts must be construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See ICA Constr. Corp. v. Reich, 60 F.3d 1495, 1497 (11th Cir.1995). Viewed in this light, the following facts emerge. Plaintiffs Mary Davis, Joseph Frannell, Wilma Rearden, Brenda Reaves and Calvin Smith are owners of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Oxford Asset Mgmt. Ltd. v. Michael JaharisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- George H. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. EdelmanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Henderson v. SUN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- Ferrari v. E-RATE CONSULTING SERVICESDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
- Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Spechler v. TobinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.