Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Narragansett Pier Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 8, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit for taxes. Certified from the Common Pleas Division on an agreed statement of facts.

1Per curiam

At the time of the assessment, the defendant owned six separate and distinct parcels of land shown on the plat put in evidence on the trial and particularly described in the account of the ratable estate of the defendant a copy of which account is annexed to the agreed statement of facts. In the assessment, these various parcels instead of being separately described and valued, as required by Pub. Stat. E. I. cap. 12, § 4, 1 are all included under the designation “Beach.” No circumstances appear to show that it was not practicable separately to describe and value the several parcels. As the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeBlois v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  2. Kettelle v. Warwick & Coventry Water Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API