Legal Opinion

People v. Hawxhurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1968No. Crim. 3222PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.

The People appeal from an order granting defendant's motion to dismiss under Penal Code, section 995. Defendant had made also a motion to suppress evidence under section 1538.5, Penal Code in support of which his counsel stated he wished to have defendant testify. Without hearing defendant testify, the court heard and ruled on the motion under section 995, Penal Code; did not pass on the other motion.

Facts

The following facts were brought out at the preliminary hearing:

At approximately 12:30 to 12:40 a.m. on December 12, 1967, Officer Tim Grundman of the Newport Beach Police Department…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HeardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. FryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Ojeda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API